This is kind of like a Show HN but without an obvious way of trying it without logging in. I may have misread?
It perhaps comes across as more like an advert and I think it might be better to submit using those guidelines to reach a wider audience here in a positive way.
I’m excited to share Odyssey Scholar, an app we’ve been working tirelessly on that reimagines how lifelong learners explore complex topics. Inspired by platforms like Duolingo, Odyssey Scholar delivers structured, bite-sized courses designed to fit into your busy day. Whether it’s leadership, philosophy, business, or psychology, we aim to make understanding challenging concepts feel approachable and rewarding.
What makes Odyssey Scholar unique?
Progressive Learning: Each subject (like leadership or productivity) is divided into sections with progressively challenging lessons. Learn at your own pace, step by step.
Focused Content: Lessons are crafted for clarity and brevity, stripping out fluff so you get the essence of each idea in 3–5 minutes.
AI + Human Collaboration: Our courses are co-created with AI to generate original, high-quality content, while human editors fact-check and enhance it for accuracy and depth.
No Visuals, More Focus: Unlike other apps, Odyssey Scholar is intentionally text-based, encouraging focus and improving attention spans.
Free and Premium Access: Start learning for free with limited daily lessons or unlock unlimited access for $14.99/month or $89.99/year.
Why we built this
We’re lifelong learners too, and we noticed a gap: while there are many resources for casual reading, finding comprehensive, structured learning on complex topics that’s easy to consume in small doses was rare. We wanted to build a platform that respects your time but still delivers meaningful insights.
Who is it for?
If you’re:
A busy professional looking to upskill.
A student eager to supplement your education.
A curious mind craving new knowledge.
Then Odyssey Scholar is for you.
Why Hacker News?
Hacker News has always been a hub for curious, thoughtful people. Your feedback has shaped countless ideas and startups. As we approach our launch, we’d love your insights. Here are a few questions we’re pondering:
Does our approach resonate with you as a learner?
What topics would you love to see on the platform?
Any challenges or concerns we should prepare for?
You can explore our platform here: https://www.odysseyscholar.com
Thank you for your time and thoughts. Let’s make lifelong learning better together!
Here’s some constructive (I hope) feedback on your site and pitch.
There’s no mention of the courses actually offered if I sign up - instant no go for me.
AI + Human course development isn’t a feature, it’s a process you used to drive efficiency. It actually makes me trust your product slightly less.
The text only format doesn’t make sense to me. Based on the AI stuff it makes me think you just couldn’t generate quality visual content with AI and didn’t want to pay someone to do it. Charts, diagrams, and visuals are obviously very important means of communicating complex information. It’s why nearly all scientific and educational content includes them.
I’m squarely in your demographic. I’m a life long continuous learner who often learns things just for the sake of learning. I have the ability to pay. I use or have used similar apps. But as presented, yours does not resonate with me (for the reasons above). I hope this is helpful.
Thank you for taking the time to provide such thoughtful and detailed feedback, it’s greatly appreciated! You're absolutely right about the importance of transparency, and we’ll prioritize making our courses visible on the site. This is essential for potential users to determine if what we offer aligns with their learning goals, so we’ll address this as a matter of urgency.
To address your concerns about AI-generated content: while it’s true that we use AI as part of our process, the content is always edited and fact-checked by humans. If any information cannot be substantiated, it’s either revised or completely replaced with factually accurate data. We fully understand the risks of AI hallucination and have built robust measures to mitigate them. In fact, in internal testing, we’ve found our fact-checking process results in content that’s often more accurate than traditionally written material. We’re even considering sharing our findings to back this claim.
Here’s a list of the courses we currently offer: Philosophy, Psychology, Science and Technology, Health and Wellness, Leadership, Business, Productivity, Economics, Critical Thinking and Logic, Decision Science, Storytelling & Narrative, Self-Help, and History's Great Ideas.
As for the lack of visuals, this decision was intentional. Our research supports the idea that reading-focused content promotes deeper understanding and retention for many learners. While visuals can aid understanding, they can also distract, particularly for individuals with ADHD (like myself). For instance, in a small test we conducted, participants who engaged with text-only content retained the material better after a week compared to those who used content with visuals. That said, we’re not entirely without visuals—where necessary (e.g., diagrams for complex ideas), we’ll include them to ensure clarity.
We’ve also kept our content short and concise, designed to be consumed in around four minutes per lesson, which research shows is an optimal length for retaining information. We leverage storytelling to engage readers and stimulate their imagination, helping them connect with the material on a deeper level. As someone who has long loved books, I know the unique power of using imagination to build and explore ideas.
I hope this provides clarity and addresses your concerns. Thank you again for your input—it helps us grow and improve!
Paivio, A., 1986. Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Thanks for your interest in our app! I wanted to let you know that the app itself is free, and all users have access to every course. However, free users are limited to just two lessons per day and won’t have access to stories or book summaries.
The paid version (and the trial period) unlocks the full experience with all the features, including unlimited lessons, quizzes, stories, book summaries, and more.
This is kind of like a Show HN but without an obvious way of trying it without logging in. I may have misread?
It perhaps comes across as more like an advert and I think it might be better to submit using those guidelines to reach a wider audience here in a positive way.
https://news.ycombinator.com/showhn.html
[dead]
Hello Hacker News!
I’m excited to share Odyssey Scholar, an app we’ve been working tirelessly on that reimagines how lifelong learners explore complex topics. Inspired by platforms like Duolingo, Odyssey Scholar delivers structured, bite-sized courses designed to fit into your busy day. Whether it’s leadership, philosophy, business, or psychology, we aim to make understanding challenging concepts feel approachable and rewarding.
What makes Odyssey Scholar unique? Progressive Learning: Each subject (like leadership or productivity) is divided into sections with progressively challenging lessons. Learn at your own pace, step by step. Focused Content: Lessons are crafted for clarity and brevity, stripping out fluff so you get the essence of each idea in 3–5 minutes. AI + Human Collaboration: Our courses are co-created with AI to generate original, high-quality content, while human editors fact-check and enhance it for accuracy and depth. No Visuals, More Focus: Unlike other apps, Odyssey Scholar is intentionally text-based, encouraging focus and improving attention spans. Free and Premium Access: Start learning for free with limited daily lessons or unlock unlimited access for $14.99/month or $89.99/year. Why we built this We’re lifelong learners too, and we noticed a gap: while there are many resources for casual reading, finding comprehensive, structured learning on complex topics that’s easy to consume in small doses was rare. We wanted to build a platform that respects your time but still delivers meaningful insights.
Who is it for? If you’re:
A busy professional looking to upskill. A student eager to supplement your education. A curious mind craving new knowledge. Then Odyssey Scholar is for you.
Why Hacker News? Hacker News has always been a hub for curious, thoughtful people. Your feedback has shaped countless ideas and startups. As we approach our launch, we’d love your insights. Here are a few questions we’re pondering:
Does our approach resonate with you as a learner? What topics would you love to see on the platform? Any challenges or concerns we should prepare for? You can explore our platform here: https://www.odysseyscholar.com
Thank you for your time and thoughts. Let’s make lifelong learning better together!
Here’s some constructive (I hope) feedback on your site and pitch.
There’s no mention of the courses actually offered if I sign up - instant no go for me.
AI + Human course development isn’t a feature, it’s a process you used to drive efficiency. It actually makes me trust your product slightly less.
The text only format doesn’t make sense to me. Based on the AI stuff it makes me think you just couldn’t generate quality visual content with AI and didn’t want to pay someone to do it. Charts, diagrams, and visuals are obviously very important means of communicating complex information. It’s why nearly all scientific and educational content includes them.
I’m squarely in your demographic. I’m a life long continuous learner who often learns things just for the sake of learning. I have the ability to pay. I use or have used similar apps. But as presented, yours does not resonate with me (for the reasons above). I hope this is helpful.
Thank you for taking the time to provide such thoughtful and detailed feedback, it’s greatly appreciated! You're absolutely right about the importance of transparency, and we’ll prioritize making our courses visible on the site. This is essential for potential users to determine if what we offer aligns with their learning goals, so we’ll address this as a matter of urgency.
To address your concerns about AI-generated content: while it’s true that we use AI as part of our process, the content is always edited and fact-checked by humans. If any information cannot be substantiated, it’s either revised or completely replaced with factually accurate data. We fully understand the risks of AI hallucination and have built robust measures to mitigate them. In fact, in internal testing, we’ve found our fact-checking process results in content that’s often more accurate than traditionally written material. We’re even considering sharing our findings to back this claim.
Here’s a list of the courses we currently offer: Philosophy, Psychology, Science and Technology, Health and Wellness, Leadership, Business, Productivity, Economics, Critical Thinking and Logic, Decision Science, Storytelling & Narrative, Self-Help, and History's Great Ideas.
As for the lack of visuals, this decision was intentional. Our research supports the idea that reading-focused content promotes deeper understanding and retention for many learners. While visuals can aid understanding, they can also distract, particularly for individuals with ADHD (like myself). For instance, in a small test we conducted, participants who engaged with text-only content retained the material better after a week compared to those who used content with visuals. That said, we’re not entirely without visuals—where necessary (e.g., diagrams for complex ideas), we’ll include them to ensure clarity.
We’ve also kept our content short and concise, designed to be consumed in around four minutes per lesson, which research shows is an optimal length for retaining information. We leverage storytelling to engage readers and stimulate their imagination, helping them connect with the material on a deeper level. As someone who has long loved books, I know the unique power of using imagination to build and explore ideas.
I hope this provides clarity and addresses your concerns. Thank you again for your input—it helps us grow and improve!
Paivio, A., 1986. Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Standing, L., 1973. Learning 10,000 pictures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25(2), pp.207-222.
Brilliantio.com, n.d. The neuroscience of storytelling. Brilliantio.
> Charts, diagrams, and visuals are obviously very important means of communicating complex information.
How else are we going to learn about the Conjoined Triangle of Success (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_nuZD4Y7IM)
Exactly because without charts and diagrams, how else would we decode the mysteries of the Conjoined Triangle of Success
I think better than a 14 day free trial may be one course being free. Or the first few lessons being free.
Thanks for your interest in our app! I wanted to let you know that the app itself is free, and all users have access to every course. However, free users are limited to just two lessons per day and won’t have access to stories or book summaries.
The paid version (and the trial period) unlocks the full experience with all the features, including unlimited lessons, quizzes, stories, book summaries, and more.